Date |
12 November 1941 |
Author |
Blough, Roy; Director, Division of Tax
Research |
Title |
Conference on Tax Program with Chairman
Marriner Eccles and Mr. Leon Henderson |
Description |
Memo to the Treasury Secretary |
Location |
Box 34; Inflation, Depression, Recovery;
Records of the Office of Tax Analysis/Division of
Tax Research; General Records of the Department
of the Treasury, Record Group 56; National
Archives, College Park, MD. |
|
November 12, 1941
MEMORANDUM
To: The Secretary
From: Mr. Blough
Subject:
Yesterday, November 11, 1941, while discussing with
Secretary Morgenthau a speech which he proposed to give
before the National Grange on Saturday, Mr. Harry White
said that he understood Mr. Henderson was disturbed
because he had not been consulted about the proposed tax
legislation. The Secretary said that he had talked with
Vice President Wallace who had told him that twice within
the last two weeks Mr. Henderson had presented a tax plan
to the SPAB. The Secretary then called Mr. Henderson and
the conversation was heard over the loud speaker by the
group present in the room. The Secretary mentioned the
matter about which Vice President Wallace had spoken. Mr.
Henderson said that he had not submitted any tax plan,
that he had presented a memorandum indicating the factors
affecting the inflation situation, including taxation.
The Secretary said that that wad not what Mr. Wallace had
said and that he was embarrassed about it. Mr. Henderson
said that he had been very much embarrassed by not
knowing about the plans of the Treasury Department. The
Secretary then invited him to come to the Treasury on
November 12 at 3:15 p.m., and said he would try to get
Chairman Eccles also.
The meeting was held in Mr. Sullivan's office. Present
were the Secretary, Chairman Eccles, Mr. Henderson,
Assistant Secretary Sullivan, Mr. Barnard, Mr. Tarleau,
and Mr. Blough. The Secretary explained briefly what the
situation was and Mr. Sullivan outlined the matter at
somewhat greater length. He pointed out that the
Treasury's plan involved a number of things in addition
to a withholding tax but that it was decided to break the
plan into the part which would be asked for immediately
and the part which would be asked for later. Chairman
Eccles said that he thought it would be impossible to get
the withholding tax without getting the other part at the
same time or previously. He said he thought it would be
necessary to close the loophole, strengthen the excess
profits tax, and do other matters which Labor insisted on
having done, such as increasing surtaxes, before it would
be possible to get the withholding tax.
Mr. Henderson and Mr. Blough then engaged in some
discussion of the work done by Mr. Shoup and his group;
Mr. Blough indicated that the Shoup report had been
discussed exhaustively with members of other governmental
staffs, including those of Mr. Eccles and Mr. Henderson.
Mr. Henderson indicated that it would be quite impossible
to make any estimate of the inflationary gap without
information which his office had concerning the plans for
civilian production and for the "victory
program." He said it was possible that ordinary
production would be so diminished that there would be
less purchasing power rather than more until the
adjustment had been made and that this adjustment might
be a slow process.
Mr. Henderson continued, saying that he had had some
people working on the subject and had had Professor John
Maurice Clark and Professor Calvin B. Hoover checking on
the assumptions. Mr. Blough pointed out that Mr. Shoup
had been in contact with members of Mrs. Henderson's
staff in the process of preparing the study and also
through the review previously mentioned.
The Secretary pointed out that matters were still in a
preliminary stage and that no program had as yet
"jelled." He asked whether if, through joint
discussion, agreement could be reached on 80 percent (for
example) of the program. Mr. Henderson and Mr. Eccles
would refrain from attacking it when presented by the
Treasury. They both said there should be a united front
and no differences before the Committees, but indicated
that they would like to testify.
|