| THE SPENDINGS TAX I. THE NEED FOR A
SPENDINGS TAX
[1] In order to satisfy the demands of our armed
forces we shall shortly have to be using more than half
of our men, machines, and materials to produce
instruments of war. This will leave less than half to
produce goods and services for current consumption --
food, clothing, housing, recreation, and the like. But
while less than half of our resources will be used to
produce goods available for civilian purchase, the
enormous combined income from both civilian and military
production will be available to spend on civilian goods.
[2] Individuals will be receiving incomes for their
works and for the use of their property whether they are
employed in producing war goods or civilian goods. They
will be receiving incomes for producing goods that they
cannot buy. The result is that we shall have a steadily
increasing flow of incomes at the same time that we have
a steadily diminishing supply of goods on which these
incomes can be spent.
[3] The basic process which simultaneously produces
the paradox of a shortage of goods and an abundance of
money and which therefore threatens us with inflation,
can be explained very simply. Yesterday, Mr. Jones was
fastening heels on ladies' shoes; today, he is fastening
heels on the Army shoes of our soldiers. Yesterday, Mr.
Smith was waiting on tables in the neighborhood
restaurant; today, he is at a machine in the new airplane
factory. Millions of Smiths and Joneses are doing the
same thing. They no longer produce goods and services
that we as civilians can buy. The goods they produce must
go to war. As a result, we must do without many of the
comforts, and some of the things we like to regard as
necessities of life. The things we must do without,
together with harder work than we have ever done, are the
price we as civilians must pay to win this war.
[4] That is only part of the story. At the same time
that about half of our economy is producing planes and
guns that we civilians cannot eat, or wear, or otherwise
use, the Smiths and Joneses who are working in that
sector of the economy are earning more money than ever
before. So the dwindling supply of civilian goods and
services is confronted, not with a shrinking or even a
steady volume of purchasing power, but rather with a
great and growing volume of purchasing power. Unless the
pressure of that spending power is reduced by taxes and
by voluntary savings, price control and rationing
barriers cannot hope to hold it in check.
[5] Left to their own devices individuals will try to
buy more goods and services than are available. On the
basis of available estimates for 1943, it is expected
that they will try to spend $85 billion on $70 billion of
goods and services. Unless this surplus buying power is
kept off the market for consumer goods, it will strip the
store shelves of goods and exert overwhelming pressure on
the price ceilings established by the Office of Price
Administration.
[6] One effective way of keeping excess money off the
market for consumer goods is through the use of taxation.
Taxes can remove this money by taking it away or by
penalizing spending so that people will not wish to
spend.
[7] Taxes have already been increased very sharply in
recent revenue acts. They are nevertheless still
inadequate. Even after paying all the taxes now on the
statute books, individuals will still be trying to spend
more on consumer goods and services than are available
for them to buy at present prices.
[8] Major reliance has so far been placed on the
personal income tax for purposes of personal taxation.
This is the fairest tax that has yet been developed. It
exempts persons with low incomes and taxes others at
progressive rates -- that is, at rates that are higher
the larger the income. It allows a greater exemption for
families than single persons, and greater exemptions for
large families than for small ones. But although the
income tax can be used still further, it does not meet
all the needs of the present situation. In the first
place, it is difficult to extend the income tax
indefinitely without imposing undue hardship on persons
with large fixed obligations to repay debt, to pay
insurance premiums or to make other types of regular
savings. Expenditures for these purposes do exert little,
if any, inflationary pressure on prices.
[9] To meet the current situation, the Treasury has
proposed as a supplement to the individual income tax a
new tax known as the spendings tax. The spendings tax can
be used beyond the point to which the income tax can be
pushed without sacrifice of equity. It retains the basic
features of exemptions and progressive rates that have
made the income tax so acceptable to democratic peoples.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE SPENDINGS TAX
[10] The spendings tax is aimed directly at the root
of our present problem, excess spending. It is levied on
the amount that individuals spend on consumer goods and
services. The spendings tax does not apply to savings.
Furthermore, it exempts certain amounts of spendings so
that a tax is payable only if spendings exceed specified
minimum accounts. These exemptions depend on marital
status and the number of dependents. The spendings tax is
levied at progressive rates so that the larger the amount
spent, the larger the tax and the higher the tax rate the
individual must pay on any additional amount spent.
[11] If a person spent less than the exempt amount he
would pay no tax. In case he spent more he would have a
tax to pay. For example, if he spent $500 in excess of
the exemption he might be required to pay a tax at a
relatively low rate. If he spent $5,000, he would pay a
tax at a very much higher rate on his additional
spendings.
[12] The amount individuals spend in the course of a
year can be determined without detailed records of
personal expenditures. It can be determined indirectly
and simply. The amount an individual spends is
necessarily equal to his income minus the amount he saves
or plus the amount he draws from previously accumulated
savings. The individual would figure the amount of his
spendings by subtracting from his income the amount of
savings or by adding to his income the amount he has
spent by drawing from his previously accumulated savings.
The steps involved in figuring the amount of spendings
can be readily illustrated. Mr. Jones has an annual
income of $2,000. His savings and other non-taxable
expenditures for the year consist of:
1. Increase in cash and bank balances
$50
2. Purchase of Government bonds 250
3. Life insurance premiums 100
4. Social Security contributions 20
5. Repayment of mortgage and other debt 200
6. Income and other personal taxes 125
7. Charitable contributions 75
8. Gifts to parents and others 130
___
$950
[13] Mr. Jones spent during the year for consumers'
goods and services the difference between $950 and $2000
or $1050. The amount of his taxable spendings would be
determined by the excess, if any, of his spendings over
his personal exemptions. These calculations would be made
at the same time and on the same form as the income tax.
[14] During the taxable year provisional amounts would
be collected from the taxpayer's income in order to
assist him in meeting the tax. The amount collected would
depend upon the size of the individual's income, the
exemptions to which he was entitled, and the rate of
collection. Collection of the spendings tax at source
could be tied in with collection of the income tax.
[15] Amounts collected at source would be credited
against the amount of tax owed as determined at the time
the spendings and income tax returns were filed. In case
the provisional amounts collected with reference to the
spendings tax exceeded the spendings tax due the taxpayer
would receive that much more credit against his income
tax. If amounts collected at source exceeded the
taxpayer's combined spendings and income tax, the excess
would be refunded to the taxpayer promptly.
[16] In those cases where collection at source is not
feasible, individuals would file quarterly returns. In
these quarterly returns they would report and pay tax on
the approximate amount of spending during the preceding
quarter. A final adjustment would be made after the close
of the year. These devices would enhance the value and
flexibility of the spendings tax in meeting war needs.
III. ADVANTAGES OF THE SPENDINGS TAX A. CONTROL OF
INFLATION.
[17] As has been indicated, the spendings tax strikes
directly at the inflationary problem. That problem arises
because the war production effort is vastly increasing
the amount of individual incomes at the same time that it
reduces the supply of goods and services available to
civilians. The record volume of spendable income, in view
of the shortage of goods and services, is exerting a
pressure which threatens to disrupt price ceilings. The
spendings tax is an effective instrument for relieving
this pressure.
[18] The spendings tax strikes directly at the problem
by discouraging spending. It imposes a tax penalty on
excess spending and this induces consumers to spend less
and save more. The penalty increases with each addition
to spending. In the case of near necessities and modest
luxuries the tax is light or moderate. For additional
spending at luxury levels the tax is heavy.
[19] The spendings tax also helps control inflation by
raising revenue. It takes away from consumers money which
they otherwise might spend. In this respect it acts like
any tax, decreasing the amount of buying power available
to demand scarce goods and services. If an individual
spends despite the penalty involved, he must pay a tax,
thereby contributing to tax revenue and absorbing
spending power.
[20] The spendings tax safeguards our system of price
controls. It does this in two ways. First, it does not
apply to expenditures incurred in connection with
production or other business activity. Therefore, it does
not enter into costs and does not create problems of
price adjustment. Second, the spendings tax is not an
additional to the prices of specific commodities or
prices of commodities in general. It avoids subjecting
all consumers to a blanket increase in the cost of
living. Therefore, it does not nullify measures of price
stabilization designed for the consumer's protection or
undermine consumers' reliance on these protective
measures.
B. EFFECTS ON WARTIME PRODUCTION
[21] The spendings tax exempts those whose standard of
living cannot be lowered without impairing their
productive efficiency. Because it is not levied at the
expense of the health, vigor and morale of workers, it
helps to maintain the flow of production. This will help
to provide guns, ships, planes, and tanks for the
fighting fronts and at the same time consumer goods and
services in adequate volume to meet the needs of the home
front.
[22] The spendings tax protects the worker's incentive
to produce and earn at a time when incentives to maximum
production are of crucial importance. Since it exempts
savings, it permits the worker to retain, free of
additional tax burden, that part of his earnings which he
saves. This enables the worker to set aside part of his
pay for use in the future when goods and services are
again abundant, and when he can buy them without injuring
both himself and the national effort. In the final
analysis this is the only way to reward the worker when,
due to wartime scarcities, it is not possible to offer
him goods available today. Thus the spendings tax is
designed to give the worker the benefits of his earnings
but to discourage him from using his earnings in ways
which will increase the strain on the economy.
C. EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF BURDENS
[23] In time of war the spendings tax adds an
important element of fairness to the tax system. As has
been indicated, major reliance can be placed on the
income tax as a means of equitable sharing of burdens.
The income tax occupies and should continue to occupy the
chief role in our tax program. However, in order to meet
the special needs of the wartime situation, it is
desirable to supplement the income tax with the spendings
tax.
[24] In time of war, as has been noted, the supply of
goods and services is being diminished at the same time
that incomes are being increased. In the normal course of
events the diminishing stock of goods will go to those
willing and able to pay the highest price for them. In
the process the working population would be deprived of
the necessities of physical well-being.
[25] Under the spendings tax, however, fair principles
would govern the distribution of goods and services. The
basic features of exemptions and progressive rates would
provide everybody with basic consumption free of tax and
would make it increasingly costly to consume more. Thus
the spendings tax is a means of effecting a more
equitable distribution of scarce commodities. It has the
effect of making the cost of goods vary according to the
individual's expenditures.
[26] This reduces the inequality in bargaining
position among persons with different amounts of income
in the markets for consumer goods, an inequality which
would be aggravated to an intolerable degree by wartime
relationships between supplies of goods and buying power.
Under the conditions which buyers would have to take into
consideration under the spendings tax, buying would more
accurately reflect need rather than superior wealth and
goods would tend to be distributed according to
individual needs and tastes.
[27] By exempting funds used to pay debts, mortgages,
insurance premiums and the like, the spendings tax avoids
unnecessary hardship. Persons who are compelled to live
on a narrow margin in order to meet these obligations
would find their tax liability reduced accordingly. Yet
this method of protection for individuals with special
obligations is fair to individuals who do not happen to
have such debts to pay, since the latter can obtain the
same tax advantage by saving in other forms, such as the
purchase of War Bonds.
[28] Under the spendings tax the individual has a
considerable degree of choice as to the amount of tax he
is to pay. To the extent he can choose how much he is to
spend, he has an important degree of freedom in adjusting
his tax burden and his spendings to his own special needs
and circumstances.
[29] Another feature deserves attention. If we depend
entirely on the income tax, many persons may attempt to
avoid wartime sacrifices and maintain peacetime standards
of comfort luxury by drawing on accumulated savings. By
using funds from this source, they would obtain for
themselves an undue share of scarce goods at the expense
of those who have no savings which they can spend. The
spendings tax would place an equitable restraint on this
practice.
[30] Certain types of expenditures may be allowed as
deductions under the spendings tax. Some forms of
expenditure may indicate distress or may have special
social importance. Examples which may be cited are
medical expenses and expenditures for training and the
acquisition of skills, education, and self-improvement.
These are types of expenditures which it is desirable not
to penalize. In order to achieve greater equity and
prevent hardship, special recognition may be given these
items by allowing their full or partial deduction.
[31] The spendings tax avoids the inequity which may
develop as a result of the piling up of burdens on the
insecure war worker who is increasing his income on the
basis of overtime and holiday labor and who is laying
aside as much as he can against the time when his job
will be finished.
[32] At the time when excessive spending threatens the
stability of the economy, the spendings tax imposes its
burden on those who are doing the spending, and
particularly on these who are doing that kind of spending
which can be curtailed with the least hardship and
interference with product efficiency.
D. POST-WAR SECURITY AND STABILIZATION
[33] The spendings tax is a wartime measure, but its
beneficial effects may be projected into the transition
from war to peace and into the following years.
[34] The spendings tax stimulates savings. These
savings give the individual an increased measure of
security against possible future loss of job or income.
The combined savings of many individuals create a backlog
of purchasing power which can be released in the post-war
period, when the production of consumer goods can again
be increased and controlled release of spending power
will serve to maintain and stabilize production and
employment. During the critical period of transition from
war to peace the spendings tax would serve as a means of
controlling (a) the rate of release of accumulated
purchasing power and (b) the rate of readjustment of
spending and saving habits.
E. ADMINISTRATIVE CONVENIENCE AND SIMPLICITY
[35] The spendings tax enters a new and important
field of taxation. Nevertheless, it does not require an
expensive additional administrative setup but can be
administered almost entirely on the basis of the existing
income tax organization. Savings, accumulated as a result
of the spendings tax, may be invested in War Bonds,
savings accounts, or in other ways which the individual
may choose for himself and which may be handled by
existing institutions and channels of investment.
[36] The administration of the spendings tax would be
made easier by public understanding and cooperation. The
dangerous significance of excessive spending under
wartime conditions is widely realized. Public
appreciation of the function of the spendings tax and its
fairness, should lead to cooperation in its application
thus easing the tasks of administration and compliance.
IV. CONCLUSION
[37] New and rapidly changing conditions demand new,
or at least especially adapted and flexible tax measures.
The spendings tax is not a new proposal. It has long been
advocated by a number of outstanding authorities and
statesmen of different shades of opinion. Present
consideration of the spendings tax, however, is prompted
by the fact that such a measure is especially appropriate
under wartime conditions. It fits the requirements of the
present situation, whether these requirements are viewed
primarily in terms of equity among individuals or
primarily in terms of promoting war production.
[38] In actual practice these requirements cannot be
dissociated because if the most threatening form of
inequity, the inflationary process of distributing scarce
goods and services, is not avoided, vital production will
inevitably suffer. The spendings tax both measures up to
the principle of democratic sharing of the war burden and
promotes rather then hinders the production we need.
[39] Without making unreasonable demands on scarce men
and machines, the spendings tax can be readily integrated
into our tax structure. It also has the virtue of
flexibility and can be adjusted to meet future conditions
arising in the accelerated tempo of wartime developments.
[40] Most important, the spendings tax will preserve
for the individual the maximum degree of freedom of
choice as a consumer, and enable him to be to a
substantial degree his own tax-assessor. Certainly, this
result would be vastly preferable to the alternatives of
a more rigid form of tax, regimentation under direct
controls, or the destructive process of inflation.
|