"Incentives at the state level do not pay for themselves," Fisher contends. "In fact, they are quite costly." Since 1980, he points out, the share of state revenue coming from corporation income taxes has slipped from 9.7 percent to just 6.2 percent. Even without the enactment of new incentives, he predicts, corporate tax revenues will continue this decline as more firms take advantage of existing incentives.
In a related article, Kirk J. Stark of the UCLA School of Law asserts that state taxation of corporate income is "simply untenable." "Not much can be said for a costly tax that doesn't raise much money," he observes pointedly.
Over time, Stark explains, the decentralized decisions of corporate managers and political actors have transformed the tax into something it was never intended to be: a type of gross receipts tax, rather than an "income" tax in the traditional understanding of that word.
If policymakers want to preserve the corporate income tax, Stark suggests, then Congress should assign it solely to the federal government. Lawmakers could then devise some sort of revenue-sharing arrangement between Washington and the states.
Please contact Tax Analysts for the full text articles.
STATE TAX NOTES is a weekly magazine covering state tax issues.
About Tax Analysts
Tax Analysts is an influential provider of tax news and analysis for the global community. Over 150,000 tax professionals in law and accounting firms, corporations, and government agencies rely on Tax Analysts' federal, state, and international content daily. Key products include Tax Notes, Tax Notes Today, State Tax Notes, State Tax Today, Tax Notes International, and Worldwide Tax Daily. Founded in 1970 as a nonprofit organization, Tax Analysts has the industry's largest tax-dedicated correspondent staff, with more than 250 domestic and international correspondents. For more information, visit our home page.
Media Release 2002-2